RTI reveals no earnings to CSIR labs from technology transfer
Some
labs of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) — India’s
premier laboratory research network — have earned no money from technology
transfer since at least 2015, according to data by the Council accessed by The
Hindu via the Right to Information Act.
Of
the 38 labs of the CSIR, 11 responded with information to The Hindu’s queries,
posed in February, on the number of technologies developed, numbers licensed
and the money earned from technology transfer since 2015. Some said they were
unable to respond because of COVID-19 restrictions.
Five
of the labs that responded said they had received “no royalty from technologies
commercialised 2015-2020”. These were the CSIR-IMTECH (Institute of Microbial
Technology), Chandigarh; CSIR-AMPRI (Advanced Materials and Processes Research
Institute), Bhopal;
The
CSIR’s revenue isn’t from technology transfer alone but also from providing
consultancy services and the RTI response didn’t include such revenues.
Not
all research labs of the CSIR are for technology development and several have a
mandate of developing technologies for poorer sections of society, according to
a CSIR official.
UN
experts flag concern on EIA notification.
A
group of Special Rapporteurs to the United Nations has written to the Centre
expressing concern over the proposed Environment Impact Assessment (EIA)
notification 2020 and sought the government’s response on how the provisions of
the notification were consonant with India’s “obligations under international
law”.
In
their letter, the five experts say the proposed notification appeared to have
clauses that obstructed people’s rights to a safe, clean and healthy
environment.
These
were the clauses that exempted several large industries and projects from
public consultation — as part of the environment impact assessment process —
and the rapporteurs argued that the exemptions were unwarranted, particularly
when there was a serious gas leak from (LG Polymers) chemical plant in
Visakhapatnam on May 12.
India
calls for protection of foreign students and stranded seafarers at G20 meet.
India
has called upon Governments around the world to ensure that interests of
foreign students are protected and movement of stranded seafarers back to their
home country facilitated.
Participating
in the G20 Foreign Ministers’ Extraordinary virtual Meeting, External Affairs
Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar also proposed development of voluntary ‘G20
Principles on Coordinated Cross-Border Movement of People’ in the backdrop of
Covid-19.
These principles are based on three elements. Standardisation of testing procedures and universal acceptability of test results, Standardisation of ‘Quarantine procedures’ and Standardisation of ‘movement and transit’ protocols.
He
also highlighted the steps taken by India in the wake of the pandemic. This
virtual meeting was convened in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.
Dr.Jaishankar
apprised the G20 Foreign Ministers about the steps taken by India including
Vande Bharat Mission and creation of ‘travel bubbles’ for the welfare and
protection of foreign citizens stranded here as well as its own citizens
abroad. The meeting was convened by the current G20 Chair, the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia, Prince Faisal Bin Farhan
Al-Saud, chaired the meeting.
The
discussions centred on strengthening international cooperation across borders
in the wake of COVID-19 crisis. The Ministers also exchanged national
experiences and lessons learned from the cross-border management measures taken
in response to the COVID-19 pandemics.
4).
MEA asserts digital companies should abide by government rules.
India
has said it remains open and continues to welcome FDI in the country including
in the area of internet technology but companies must operate in accordance
with the regulatory framework of government.
Responding
to a query on banning of mobile apps, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson
AnuragSrivastava said India has one of the most open regimes for FDI in the
world and this includes for internet companies as well as digital technology
companies.
He
said digital technology companies while operating in India have the
responsibility to abide by the rules and regulations issued by the concerned
Ministries and departments of the government.
The
Supreme Court on Thursday directed banks that loan accounts in the clear till
the expiry of the moratorium on August 31 should not be declared as
non-performing assets (NPAs) till further orders.
The
order was passed amid apprehensions raised by individual borrowers and
representatives of various commercial sectors on whether their loans would be
declared NPAs on September 1, the day after the expiry of the moratorium.
The
court is examining the question whether compound interest (interest on
interest) should be charged on loans deferred during the moratorium period. The
Bench is also examining the powers of the Centre and the National Disaster
Management Authority to provide relief to borrowers, reeling under the
financial effects of the pandemic.
Solicitor
General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre and RBI, submitted that the impact of the
pandemic was varied for each sector. Some like pharma have fared well during
the lockdown.
“The
idea of moratorium was to defer repayment to ease the burden caused by COVID-19
and lockdown so that businesses can manage working capital. The idea was not to
waive interest,” Mr. Mehta said.
Moratorium
was to help those in distress and not meant as an opportunity for those already
defaulting in their loan payments.
Instead
of loan waiver, steps were being taken to revive the various sectors, he
submitted. Loan accounts became NPAs only if payments were not made for 90
days. The moratorium period was excluded from 90 days. “Accounts do not become
NPAs on September 1,” he assured the court.
Govt
launches immunity boosting products under PMBJP
Chemicals
and Fertilizers Minister D V SadanandaGowda today launched eight immunity
boosting products under PradhanMantriBhartiyaJanaushadhiPriyojana for sale
through JanaushadhiKendras across country.
Center
of Excellence on Use of Artificial Intelligence in NHAI.
National
Highways Authority of India (NHAI) signed a MoU with the IIT, Delhi to set up a
Centre of Excellence (CoE) for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Data Driven
decision making and Advance Data Management System for Highways.
About:
Under
the partnership, IIT Delhi will work with NHAI on developing advance analytics
based on AI and ML, prepare simulation models, enhance data storage and
retrieval capacities to further strengthen NHAI’s capabilities in data-driven
decision making.
The
collaboration will be undertaken on the identified thrust areas like the
Project Management and Data Management, Highway Network Traffic Demand and
Incident Management, Highway safety, Highway Work-zone Management, Highway
Pavement Management System.
Under
it, a Co-ordination Committee will be constituted for overall coordination and
timely progress. It will be chaired by the Dean R&D, IIT Delhi
Researchers
at IISC develops low cost printing technique
The
researchers at the Centre for Nano Science and Engineering in the Bengaluru
based Indian Institute of Science have developed a low cost, on demand printing
technique. This new technique replaces the nozzles of an inkjet printer with a
mesh covered chemically treated nano wires that repel water.
Because
of the short contact time of the impacting droplet with the mesh, the chances
of clogging the pore are minimised. The mesh can also be easily cleaned and
reused.
P.Iniyan
wins the 48th annual world open chess tournament
India’s
GM P. Iniyan won the 48th annual world open chess tournament (online) recently.
Usually held in Philadelphia, the USA, the tournament was conducted online
following classical time control.
In
a strong field that had 31 GMs, Iniyan scored 7.5 points from nine games.
Iniyan and SananSjugirov (Russia) were tied on points but the former won on
better tie-break.
Special focus on mains.
Q.)
Concerning points made in the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World
(SOFI) report regarding Food security of India, what are the challenges and
hurdles that India is facing to achieve full food security despite having many
schemes. Critically Analyse.
Context:
Data
from the latest edition of the State of Food Security and Nutrition in the
World (SOFI) report show that India retains the dubious distinction of being
the country with the largest population of food insecure people.
Estimates
presented in the report which was released by several United Nations
organisations show that the prevalence of food insecurity increased by 3.8
percentage points in India between 2014 and 2019, the first term of the
Narendra Modi government.
By
2019, 6.2 crore more people were living with food insecurity than the number in
2014.
The
SOFI report, which is published annually, presents the most authoritative
evaluation of hunger and food insecurity in the world.
Since
2017, SOFI presents two key measures of food insecurity: the conventional
measure called the Prevalence of Undernourishment (PoU) and a new measure
called the Prevalence of Moderate and Severe Food Insecurity (PMSFI).
Both
of these are globally-accepted indicators of progress towards the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDG) Target 2.1 to end hunger and food insecurity.
While
PoU is focused on estimating the proportion of population facing chronic
deficiency of calories, the PMSFI is a more comprehensive measure of the lack
of access to adequate and nutritious food.
Estimates
of PoU are based on food balance sheets and national surveys of consumption.
Given that consumption surveys are done infrequently in most countries, these
estimates are often based on outdated data and are revised when better data
become available.
The
PMSFI is based on annual surveys that collect information on experiences of
food insecurity (such as food shortages, skipping meals, and changing diet
diversity because of a lack of resources).
The
PMSFI uses the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), a gold standard in food
security measurement developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO), for estimating globally-comparable prevalence rates.
Given
the solid conceptual foundations of this methodology and the ease of collection
of data, FIES and the PMFSI have been widely adopted by countries across the
world.
The
FAO commissions Gallup to include FIES questions in the Gallup®World Poll
(FAO-GWP) survey conducted in more than 140 countries across the world. Many
countries have also started conducting their own FIES surveys.
Unlike
most other countries, the government of India neither conducts official FIES
surveys nor accepts estimates based on FAO-GWP surveys.
Although
FAO-GWP surveys are conducted in India, India is among the few countries that
do not allow publication of estimates based on these surveys.
Consequently,
as in the past years, estimates of PMSFI for India are not published in SOFI.
Country data:
The
report provides three-year average estimates of the number of food insecure
people for South Asia as a whole and for South Asia (excluding India). By
taking a difference between the two, one can derive the estimates for India.
These
estimates show that while 27.8% of India’s population suffered from moderate or
severe food insecurity in 2014-16, the proportion rose to 31.6% in 2017-19.
The
number of food insecure people grew from 42.65 crore in 2014-16 to 48.86 crore
in 2017-19. India accounted for 22% of the global burden of food insecurity,
the highest for any country, in 2017-19.
It
is also noteworthy that while the PMSFI increased in India by 3.7 percentage
points during this period, it fell by 0.5 percentage points in the rest of
South Asia.
Availability
of data and significance to PMSFI:
India
has not released the latest National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) consumption
expenditure survey data for 2017-18.
Lack
of availability of data from this consumption survey also has implications for
the FAO’s PoU estimates for India.
Because
of a lack of regular availability of consumption survey data from most
countries, the FAO uses supply-wise data on per capita food availability to
measure changes in average per capita calorie intake.
While
this is a reasonable approach, it has become untenable for India because of a
large and growing disparity between the supply-side data and data from the
consumption surveys.
Not
only do the supply-side data show a much higher level of per capita
availability of food than the amount of food that is captured to have been
consumed in the surveys, even the direction of change between the two does not
seem to be consistent.
While
the per capita dietary energy supply in India increased by 3.8% between 2011-13
and 2015-17, the consumption survey data that became available through a media
leak showed that the average consumption expenditure (covering food and other
expenses) fell by 3.7% between 2011-12 and 2017-18.
On
the whole, withholding of consumption survey data by the government has meant
that SOFI continues to use outdated data for variability of food intake, making
PoU estimates for India untenable.
Given
this, estimates of the PMSFI for India have become particularly valuable.
Causes of suffering:
The
significant rise in food insecurity, as shown by these data, is a clear
manifestation of the overall economic distress during this period marked by a
deepening agrarian crisis, falling investments across sectors and shrinking
employment opportunities.
It
is widely believed that demonetisation and introduction of the Goods and
Services Tax were two prime causes of economic distress during this period.
A
sudden imposition of an unprecedented and prolonged lockdown in the wake of the
COVID-19 pandemic has brought renewed focus on the problems of hunger and food
insecurity.
With
a sudden loss of livelihoods, a vast majority of India’s poor are faced with
increased food insecurity, hunger and starvation. A number of starvation deaths
have also been reported in the media.
Conclusion:
These
estimates of the PMSFI provide an important baseline estimate for the situation
before the COVID-19 pandemic.
It
is critical for India to conduct a national survey on food insecurity to assess
the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on food security of different sections of
the population.